Implied temperature rise metrics: a compass without direction?
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management · 2026
Climate Finance & Corporate Finance
I am on the 2026/27 academic job market.
I work on climate and corporate finance. My job market paper shows that firms facing stronger import competition reduce their Scope 1 and 2 emission intensities.
Using reductions in import tariffs as a quasi-natural experiment, we find that stronger competition lowers firms’ Scope 1 and 2 emission intensities. Firms with high emission intensity respond with visible environmental measures, while firms with low intensity increase investment instead.
Presentations: Paris December Finance Meeting (EUROFIDAI–ESSEC) 2026, upcoming · German Finance Association (DGF) 2026 · RCF–ECGI Corporate Finance and Governance Conference 2025 · Liechtenstein Workshop of Sustainable Finance 2025
My job market paper, joint with Raphaela Roeder, Sebastian Utz and Martin Nerlinger, studies how competition affects firms’ carbon performance.
My other projects in climate finance addressed greenwashing and its relation to ESG scores, and the divergence of Implied Temperature Rise metrics. They kept raising the same question: how reliable are the metrics that climate finance builds on?
That question eventually led me to the data underneath. Many corporate emissions figures are estimates and are revised after the fact, so today’s data often differ from what investors could observe at the time. I reconstruct these histories point in time and quantify how much existing results depend on information that was not yet available.
My dissertation at the University of St. Gallen examined how leveraged buyouts affect the target’s competitors.
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management · 2026
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · 241, 107354
Finance Research Letters · 74, 106710